A Correction and Brief Reply To Montenegro’s (2015) ‘A Comparison Of Freudian and Bossian Approaches To Dreams’
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65828/ghp10r66Complete access to the full archive of articles is available with SEA membership. Existing members: please log in with your membership password to view full text. Non-members can buy a single article or issue by registering an account on this website, then selecting a padlocked full text button to purchase.
References
Ashworth, P. (ed.) (2003). An approach to phenomenological psychology: the contingencies of the lifeworld. Special issue of Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 34(2). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156916203322847119
Gendlin, E.T. (1977). Phenomenological concept versus phenomenological method: a critique of Medard Boss on dreams. Soundings, 60, pp. 285-300. [Downloaded from www.focusing.org/gendlin/docs/gol_2045.html]
Heidegger, M. (2001). Zollikon Seminars: protocols – conversations – letters. Trans. Mayr, F. & Askay, R. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Langdridge, D. (2006). Imaginative variations on selfhood: elaborating an existential-phenomenological approach to dream analysis. Existential Analysis, 17(1): 2-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65828/nb2s4d26
Montenegro, M. (2015). A comparison of Freudian and Bossian approaches to dreams. Existential Analysis, 26(2): 313-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65828/m9a2cp24
