All for One and One for All? An Existential Perspective on Family and Systems Work as a Form of Therapeutic Intervention

Authors

  • Marc Medina Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65828/9sd99895

Keywords:

Cybernetics, Family Therapy, Systems Theory, Individuation, Relatedness.

Abstract

The desire to observe and work with the family as the primary unit in the individual’s social context has lead to the development of various family therapy methodologies that seem to be predicated on one or both of two theoretical formulations, the first of which is philosophical and the second scientific. This paper seeks to explore these formulations and in so doing elucidate an existential perspective on Family Therapy. Whilst at first glance the aim of supporting autonomy while preserving mutuality (Minuchin 1974) would appear to have an affinity with the existential psychotherapeutic approach the question still remains as to whether it is really possible or desirable to view the family as the type of structure that can be imbued with the laws of organisational dynamics without loosing empathy for its individual members and whether in reality it is therapeutic for the individual in crisis (often with the family itself) to remain both autonomous and embedded in any meaningful way?

Full text available
Complete access to the full archive of articles is available with SEA membership. Existing members: please log in with your membership password to view full text. Non-members can buy a single article or issue by registering an account on this website, then selecting a padlocked full text button to purchase.

References

Bateson, G. (1973). Steps to an Ecology of the Mind. St. Albans: Paladin.

Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and Nature: A Necessary Unit. New York: E.P. Dutton.

Bennett, L.A., Wolin, S. and McAvity, K. (1988). Family identity, ritual, and myth: A cultural perspective on life cycle transitions. In Falicov, C.J. (ed) Family Transitions, 211-234. New York Guilford Press.

Brodey, W.M. (1967). A cybernetic approach to family therapy. In Zuk, G.H. and Boszormenyi-Nagy, I. (eds) Family Therapy and Disturbed Families. Palo Alto, Calif: Science and behaviour Books.

Buber, M. (1957). Distance and relation. Psychiatry, 20, 97-104.

Gergen, K. (1991). The Saturated Self. New York: Basic Books.

Haldane, D. and McClusky, U. (1982). Existentialism and family therapy: A neglected perspective. Journal of Family Therapy, (1982) 4: 117-132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j..1982.00581.x

Haley, J. (1968). The family of the schizophrenic: A model system. In Jackson, D.D. (ed) Communication, Family and Marriage and Change. Palo Alto, Calif: Science and Behaviour Books.

Jackson, D.D. (1973). Family therapy in the family of the schizophrenic. In Jackson, D.D. (ed) Therapy, Communication and Change. Palo Alto, Calif: Science and Behaviour Books.

Keeney, B.P. and Ross, J.M. (1983). Cybernetics of brief family therapy. Journal of Martial and Family Therapy, Vol. 9, No. 4, 375-382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01525.x

Laing, R.D. (1971). The family and invalidation. In The Politics of the Family. London: Tavistock. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351054089-5

Melito, R. (2006). Integrating individual and family therapies: A structural-developmental approach. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, Vol. 16, No.3, 346-381. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1053-0479.16.3.346

Minuchin, S. (1974). Families and Family Therapy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674041127

Nightingale, F. (1852). Cassandra. New York: Columbia University Feminist Press.

Satir, V. (1967). In Haley, J and Hoffman, L., 'A Family of Angels: An Interview with Virginia Satir' (pages 97-117) in Techniques of Family Therapy. New York/London: Basic Books

Walsh, F. (2002). Conceptualisations of normal family functioning. In Walsh, F. (ed) Normal family processes: Third Edition. Growing Diversity and Complexity. New York Guilford Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203428436

Wolin, S. and Bennett, L.A. (1984). Family rituals. Family Process, 23, 401-420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.1984.00401.x

Published

2010-07-01

Cite This Article

All for One and One for All? An Existential Perspective on Family and Systems Work as a Form of Therapeutic Intervention. (2010). Existential Analysis: Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis, 21(2), 263-270. https://doi.org/10.65828/9sd99895
Download: RIS · BibTeX

Articles by the same author(s)

Related articles

Search for similar articles ›