The Idea For Which I Can Live Or Die

Another Look at Kierkegaard's Leap of Faith

Authors

  • Rosemary Lodge Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65828/s64qpc11

Keywords:

Kierkegaard, leap of faith, existential, relationship, subjective truth.

Abstract

This paper looks at the Kierkegaardian leap of faith and considers whether it is possible for an existential therapist to make such a leap. It is argued that for Kierkegaard the 'how' of faith – a passionate commitment to one's own subjective truth – is inextricably linked with the 'what' of faith – namely a leap into the arms of a creator God. Consequently, it is problematic to take Kierkegaard's leap of faith as a general inspiration to follow one's own internal conviction. It is also argued that Kierkegaard's leap of faith possibly represents an attempt to step outside of relationship with others and, as such, is not necessarily an option for an existential therapist whose subjective truth is always in the process of being co-created in relationship.

Full text available
Complete access to the full archive of articles is available with SEA membership. Existing members: please log in with your membership password to view full text. Non-members can buy a single article or issue by registering an account on this website, then selecting a padlocked full text button to purchase.

References

Bretall, R. (ed.) (1973). A Kierkegaard Anthology. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Cooper, M. (2003). Existential Therapies. London: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036234898

Deurzen-Smith, E.V. (1997). Everyday Mysteries. London: Routledge.

Du Plock (1993). Dialogue or Diatribe?: A brief comparison of the implications for client-therapist interaction of existential and cognitive-analytic approaches. Journal of Society for Existential Analysis, 4: 91-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65828/mn9pd655

Du Plock (2005). Some thoughts on counselling psychology and the therapeutic use of texts in clinical practice. Counselling Psychology Review, 20(2): 12-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpr.2005.20.2.12

Gardiner, P. (1988). Kierkegaard. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Golomb, J. (1995). In Search of Authenticity. Oxon: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203006795

Hayes, H. (2006). To Despair in the right way? Journal of Society for Existential Analysis, 17: 84-101.

Heaton, J.M. (1991). The Divided Self: Kierkegaard or Winnicott? Journal of Society for Existential Analysis, 2: 30-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65828/e2wdhe12

Howard, A. (2000). Philosophy for Counselling and Psychotherapy. Hampshire: Palgrave. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-04644-4

Kierkegaard, S. (1989). The Sickness Unto Death. London: Penguin Books.

Kierkegaard, S. (1992). Either/Or A Fragment of Life. London: Penguin Books.

Kierkegaard, S. (1992). Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments Volume 1. London: Penguin Books.

Kierkegaard, S. (2005). Fear and Trembling. London: Penguin Books.

Minton, S.J. (2000). A Brief Reflection on Kierkegaard's Legacy to Contemporary Psychotherapy. Journal of Society for Existential Analysis, 11.2: 81-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65828/3y8v2971

Poole, R. and Stangerup, H. (eds.) (1989). A Kierkegaard Reader. London: Fourth Estate.

Rogers, C.R. (1967). On Becoming a Person. London: Constable.

Published

2007-07-01

Cite This Article

The Idea For Which I Can Live Or Die: Another Look at Kierkegaard’s Leap of Faith. (2007). Existential Analysis: Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis, 18(2), 212-219. https://doi.org/10.65828/s64qpc11
Download: RIS · BibTeX

Articles by the same author(s)

Related articles