Nakedness As A Necessity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65828/24fqyv78Keywords:
Therapist disclosure, professional expectations, ethicsAbstract
This paper aims to explore when therapist disclosure is 'acceptable', the difference between in-therapy and in-the-(non-therapy-)world. The discussion from the 2017 conference is briefly reflected upon, along with examples since of disclosure being present in-therapy in an unpredictable way. The idea of needing to think through how (unknown) clients may feel is discussed with a view that therapists are deserving of the life they want, and in that sense, should be permitted to engage with the world as they find it, how they want to. Freud, or rather Reich, argued the therapist needs to be a blank screen, something for the client to use to project onto them whatever needs exploring (Reich, 1933). Contrarily, I would argue that as a psychotherapist in the modern day, we should be true to our own opinions, certainly outside the therapy room, ideally inside as well (depending on the situation) and be involved in the world however we want to be rather than conforming, or even trying to conform, to an archaic stereotyping of our profession.
Complete access to the full archive of articles is available with SEA membership. Existing members: please log in with your membership password to view full text. Non-members can buy a single article or issue by registering an account on this website, then selecting a padlocked full text button to purchase.
References
Merleau-Ponty, M. (2015). Phenomenology of Perception. London: Forgotten Books. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720714
Reich, W. (1933). Character Analysis. New York: Orgone Institute Press.


