Have You Ever Wondered What It Might Be Like To Try And Cuddle A Tiger? An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Practitioners’ Experience of Aggression
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65828/yvqv4c23Keywords:
Aggression, Critique, Health, PathologyAbstract
Whilst human aggression is discussed widely in psychological literature, it is often discussed as if it is outside the control of the somewhat passive individual, who requires interventions to prevent or control it, implying that all aggression is pathological. Whilst this has its uses, it provides only a one-sided view, and contributes little to a fuller understanding of the experience of aggression. In order to begin to redress this, this paper presents findings from an Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA) into therapeutic practitioners' experience of aggression. Their accounts attended to the bodily sensations, feelings and impulses that the experience of aggression, both their own and other people's, engendered. The tendency to want to 'rid' aggression was associated with fear, anger, and an impulse to 'attack back'. Participants suggested the need to engage with these emotions, resisting the impulse to 'attack back', in order to be able to allow clients to bring their aggression, explore it, and engage with it in a constructive manner. In contrast to the current psychological literature, participants described themselves and their work as active in engendering aggression, and outlined the normality of it. This raises questions for clients and clinicians in the need to acknowledge the impact on the therapeutic relationship itself and raises wider socio-political questions about the current policy on aggression within our society.
Complete access to the full archive of articles is available with SEA membership. Existing members: please log in with your membership password to view full text. Non-members can buy a single article or issue by registering an account on this website, then selecting a padlocked full text button to purchase.
References
Brocki, J.M. and Wearden, A.J. (2006). A critical evaluation of the use of interpretative phenomenological analysis (IPA) in health psychology. Psychology and Health, 21(1): 87-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14768320500230185
Elliott, R., Fischer, C. and Rennie, D. L. (1999). Evolving guidelines for publication of qualitative research studies in psychology and related fields. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 38: 215-229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/014466599162782
Fletcher, R. and Milton, M. (2007). Being aggressive: An existential-phenomenological critique of the psychological literature on Human Aggression. Existential Analysis, 18.2, 297-314. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65828/xeh0wm33
Milton, M. (2005). The process of transformation: A fighter's perspective. Counselling Psychology Review, 20(1): 2-10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpr.2005.20.1.2
Smith, J. Jarman, M. and Osborn, M. (1999). Doing interpretative phenomenological analysis. In Murray, M. and Chamberlain, K. Qualitative health psychology: Theories and methods. London: Sage publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446217870.n14
Willig, C. (2001). Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology: Adventures in Theory and Method. Buckingham Philadelphia: Open University Press.


