Phenomenology and the Practice of Science

Authors

  • Amedeo Giorgi Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.65828/sfxgt918

Abstract

Phenomenology is a relatively new philosophy with some distinguishable features and when social scientists base their research methods on that perspective sometimes variations in methods take place that are attributed to phenomenology but the variations are not necessarily consistent with the phenomenological perspective nor with good scientific practices. When the modifications are not consistent it is usually because the claim is based on the failure to distinguish between phenomenology as a philosophy and phenomenology as a theory of science. Such ambiguities can arise because there is not as yet a fully developed phenomenological theory of science even though its articulation is sorely needed. In this article, some examples of the types of methodical errors practiced by promoters of the phenomenological approach that exist in the literature are examined. The conclusion reached is that the methodical errors are due to violations of principles of good science and the modifications are not consistent with the phenomenological perspective.

Full text available
Complete access to the full archive of articles is available with SEA membership. Existing members: please log in with your membership password to view full text. Non-members can buy a single article or issue by registering an account on this website, then selecting a padlocked full text button to purchase.

References

Allport, G. (1953). The psychologist's frame of reference. Psychological Bulletin, 37, 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0060064

Charmaz, K. (2008). Grounded theory. In Smith, J.A. (ed) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research, 2nd Ed. London: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232764.n4

Colaizzi, P. (1973). Reflections and Research in Psychology. Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company.

Colaizzi, P. (1978). Qualitative research as the phenomenologist views it. In Valle, R. and King, M. (eds). Existential Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology (pp.48-71). NY: Oxford University Press.

Eatough, V., and Smith, J.A. (2008). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. In Willig, C. and Stainton-Rogers, W. (eds). The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research in Psychology (pp. 179-194). London: Sage Publications. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848607927

Friedeberg, B. (2002). Psychologists' experiences moving through "countertransference" toward "empathy": A phenomenological investigation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Saybrook Graduate School, San Francisco, California.

Giorgi, A. (2006a). Difficulties encountered in the application of the phenomenological method in the social sciences. Análise Psicológica 3, (XXIV) 353-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14417/ap.175

Giorgi A. (2006b). Concerning variations in the application of the phenomenological method. The Humanistic Psychologist, 34, 305-319. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15473333thp3404_2

Giorgi, Amedeo, & Giorgi, Barbro. (2008) Phenomenology. In Jonathan A. Smith (ed). Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods (2nd ed., pp. 26-52). London: Sage Publications Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232764

Harder, I., and Norlyk, A. (In Press). What makes a phenomenological study phenomenological: An analysis of peer-reviewed empirical nursing studies. Qualitative Health Research.

Hardy, L., and Embree, L. (eds). (1992). The Phenomenology of Natural Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2622-9

Harvey, C.W. (1989). Husserl's Phenomenology and Foundations of Natural Science. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press.

Husserl, E. (1970). Logical Investigation. Trans. Findlay, J.N. NY: Humanities Press. (German original 1900).

Husserl, E. (1983). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book. Trans. Kersten, F. The Hague: Nijhoff (German original 1913). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-8779-1

James, William. (1890). Principles of Psychology. London: MacMillan.

James, William. (1902). Varieties of Religious Experience. NY: Modern Library.

MacLeod, R.B. (1947) The phenomenological approach to social psychology. Psychological Review. 54, 193-210. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059320

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of Perception. NY: Humanities Press. (French original 1945). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720714

Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964) Phenomenology and the sciences of man. Trans. Wild, J. In Merleau-Ponty, M. (Edie, J.M. [ed]) The Primacy of Perception. (pp. 43-95) Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press (French original, 1961). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203720714

Morse, J.M. and Field, P.A. (1995). Qualitative Research Methods for Health Professionals (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Packer, M.J. and Addison, R.B. (eds). (1989). Entering the Circle: Hermeneutic Investigations in Psychology. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Palmer, R.E. (1969). Hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Rogers, C. (1964). Toward a science of the person. In Wann, T. (ed) Behaviorism and Phenomenology: Contrasting Bases for Modern Psychology. (pp. 109-133) Chicago II. University of Chicago Press.

Smith, J.A. and Osborn, M. (2008). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. In Smith, J.A. (ed) Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods, 2nd Ed. (pp. 53-80) London: Sage Publication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781036232764

Snodgrass, B.J. (2002). Grandmothers as surrogate parents: A phenomenological study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas.

Snygg, D. (1941). The need for a phenomenological system of psychology. Psychological Review, 48, 404-424. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/h0059710

Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.

Streseman, L.H. (2007). A phenomenological study of the lived experience of clinical intuition. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Saybrook Graduate School, San Francisco, California.

Ströker, E. (1997). Husserlian Foundations of Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-015-8824-9

Wertz, F. (1983). From everyday to psychological description: Analyzing the moments of a qualitative data analysis. Journal of Phenomenological Psychology, 14, 197-241. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/156916283x00108

Published

2010-01-01

Cite This Article

Phenomenology and the Practice of Science. (2010). Existential Analysis: Journal of the Society for Existential Analysis, 21(1), 3-22. https://doi.org/10.65828/sfxgt918
Download: RIS · BibTeX