An Existential-Phenomenological Inquiry into the Meaning of Clinical Supervision
What do we mean when we talk about 'Existential-Phenomenological Supervision?'
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.65828/sgx54j84Abstract
A study utilising a phenomenological research method was undertaken to surface the essential structures of the concept 'existential-phenomenological clinical supervision', as experienced by a sample of eighteen existential therapists who were also both facilitating and receiving such supervision. Content analysis and frequency measuring were performed. These operations identified four dimensions of groups of statements describing existential-phenomenological supervision from the perspective of supervisors: 'attending to the 'Being' of the supervisee', 'support and maintenance of a philosophical attitude'; promotion of relational perspective', and 'supervisor as colleague/mentor'. These four dimensions of groups of statements were also generated describing existential-phenomenological supervision from the perspective of supervisees. Overall there was a marked congruence between statements describing existential-phenomenological supervision, whether participants responded as facilitators or as supervisees. An exhaustive summary statement was generated and distributed to co-researchers, who provided feedback on the extent to which they felt this captured their subjective sense of the phenomenon. They were also asked to reflect upon the impact of this research on their own supervisory activities. While further research is necessary, these preliminary findings may evidence the degree to which existential-phenomenological supervision constitutes a distinctive form of supervision characterised by its focus on ways of being in relationship and on collaborative, non-authoritative exploration and reflection.
Complete access to the full archive of articles is available with SEA membership. Existing members: please log in with your membership password to view full text. Non-members can buy a single article or issue by registering an account on this website, then selecting a padlocked full text button to purchase.
References
Adams, M. (2002). Reflections on Reflection. Existential Analysis, Vol.13, No. 2, 204-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65828/8d9ffa87
Colaizzi, P.F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it, in R.S. Valle and M. King (eds), Existential-Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
Du Plock, S. (2008). Living ME. Some Reflections on the Experience of Being Diagnosed with a Chronic 'Psycho-somatic' Illness. Existential Analysis. Vol. 19, No, 46-57. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65828/wma60444
Du Plock, S. (2007). A Relational Approach to Supervision: Some Reflections on Supervision from an Existential-Phenomenological Perspective. Existential Analysis. Vol. 18, No. 1, 31-38. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65828/xbzhdz78
Du Plock, S. (1998). Clinical Supervision from the Humanistic and Existential Perspectives: A Comparison. Collected Papers of the First Vilnius University Conference on Existential Psychology. University of Vilnius: Lithuania.
Feasey, D. (2002). Good Practice in Supervision with Psychotherapists and Counsellors. London: Whurr.
Mitchell, D. (2000). Is the concept of supervision at odds with existential thinking and therapeutic practice? Existential Analysis. Vol. 13, No. 1, 91-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65828/dprmb466
Pett, J. (1995). A Personal Approach to Existential Supervision. Existential Analysis. Vol. 6, No. 2, 117-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65828/n4vpze72
Wright, R. (1996). Another Approach to Existential Supervision. Existential Analysis. Vol. 7, No. 1, 149-158. DOI: https://doi.org/10.65828/6f836495


